Among the millions of pages in the CIA’s declassified electronic reading room are hundreds of individual remote viewing session reports, records of a program that ran from 1972 to 1995 under a series of names, most publicly known as Stargate Project. The program’s premise was that trained individuals could describe distant or hidden locations and objects using only their minds, an approach one congressman reportedly described at the time as an attempt at “a hell of a cheap radar system.”
What the Program Actually Was
Stargate operated for 23 years across multiple agencies, funded through Army and CIA channels, involving both government researchers and outside contractors at organizations including SRI International. Individual session reports, of the kind now sitting in the CIA reading room, describe viewers attempting to identify targets, buildings, vehicles, hidden objects, chosen by a separate team member without the viewer’s knowledge, and record how closely their described impressions matched the actual target afterward.
The 1995 Evaluation
In 1995, the CIA commissioned the American Institutes for Research, an outside firm with no stake in the program’s continuation, to review its results before deciding whether to keep funding it. AIR assigned two reviewers: statistician Jessica Utts and psychologist Ray Hyman. Their conclusions diverged. Utts found the aggregated statistical results across sessions showed an effect larger than chance would predict. Hyman agreed the statistical pattern existed but concluded it had never been shown to have operational intelligence value, no session had ever been used to inform an actual decision with confirmed real-world results. AIR’s combined report concluded remote viewing had not been demonstrated to work through a defined psychic mechanism and had not produced usable operational intelligence. The CIA canceled the program and declassified the files that same year.
What Gets Lost in the Retelling
The program is frequently described online as either thoroughly debunked or secretly validated, and neither framing matches the actual 1995 finding. The evaluation did not conclude the statistical results were fabricated or nonexistent; Utts, the statistician on the review, stood by the significance of the aggregate pattern. It concluded that whatever produced that pattern had not been shown to be a reliable, controllable intelligence tool, and that no session had ever changed a real intelligence outcome. Those are two different findings, and only the second one is actually why the program was shut down.
What Remains Unresolved
Individual session reports, like the ones housed in the CIA reading room, remain open to inspection by anyone: the raw material, target descriptions and viewer transcripts side by side, is public record. What is not resolved, and was not resolved by AIR’s 1995 report, is why the aggregate statistical pattern Utts identified existed at all, if it did not reflect a usable operational capability. The government’s answer was to fund the research for 23 years, commission an outside review, and then close the file without settling that specific question either way. It is the same pattern this site has traced in other declassified-but-unsettled programs, including Stanton Friedman’s defense of the Majestic-12 documents: real documents, a real official review, and no final word on what the underlying pattern actually means.
Leave a Reply